"Will Obama destroy science?" by John Derbyshire
"The People vs. James Watson" by Pyotr N. Petrov
30 October, 2008
25 October, 2008
On Antisemitism
(Originally posted elsewhere; cross-posted in case of deletion.)
Since it is impossible under the circumstances to state my objections to antisemitism on philosophic grounds—for it is a wide topic, as diverse in its ramifications as the crimes and abuses with which the Jews have been charged—I shall content myself with a brief description of its political consequences:
* It is divisive - witness the present discussion!
* It turns people away. People otherwise receptive to nationalism and race realism are repelled by its association with antisemitism;
* It makes coalition-building extremely difficult, if not impossible. If we ever reverse the tide of Third World immigration, it will be for a great plurality of reasons, not strictly racial. Nationalists will have to make their voices heard amongst the clamor of other interest groups, and align themselves, as much as possible without sacrificing their core principles, with mainstream forces whose interests overlap with their own.
* It diverts our attention from activities, more fruitful in their issue, with which the public are broadly sympathic. Examples include immigration restriction, opposition to affirmative action policies, and the promotion of white culture. It tarnishes those same activities by way of association.
Even if we grant the Jewish Question as it is here treated a certain academic interest, yet as an article of faith to be signed, as a doctrine to be professed, its consquences have been utterly disastrous for the pro-white movement.
Since it is impossible under the circumstances to state my objections to antisemitism on philosophic grounds—for it is a wide topic, as diverse in its ramifications as the crimes and abuses with which the Jews have been charged—I shall content myself with a brief description of its political consequences:
* It is divisive - witness the present discussion!
* It turns people away. People otherwise receptive to nationalism and race realism are repelled by its association with antisemitism;
* It makes coalition-building extremely difficult, if not impossible. If we ever reverse the tide of Third World immigration, it will be for a great plurality of reasons, not strictly racial. Nationalists will have to make their voices heard amongst the clamor of other interest groups, and align themselves, as much as possible without sacrificing their core principles, with mainstream forces whose interests overlap with their own.
* It diverts our attention from activities, more fruitful in their issue, with which the public are broadly sympathic. Examples include immigration restriction, opposition to affirmative action policies, and the promotion of white culture. It tarnishes those same activities by way of association.
Even if we grant the Jewish Question as it is here treated a certain academic interest, yet as an article of faith to be signed, as a doctrine to be professed, its consquences have been utterly disastrous for the pro-white movement.
24 August, 2008
Interview with Jared Taylor
http://books.google.ca/books?id=RonIunZ521sC&pg=PA87&dq=%22jared+taylor&sig=ACfU3U0l3vCSPGTIZTDmQDt7qDXWSPW5-g
Excertped from Contemporary Voices of White Nationalism in America by Carol Miller Swain.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
